May 11 — Jun 9, 2026
Subjects
200
unique IDs in dataset
Images
600
front + left + right
Mean Age
41.6
predicted age (years)
Avg Quality
84.1
mean across front, left, right

Personas

Audience segments grouped by shared skin profiles, based on 73 subjects · 127 excluded (incomplete skin data).

Segment 1 — Young, oily, low-hydration

This segment is mostly oily (94%) and young, with an average age of 29, and it scores lowest on hydration (38) and uniformness (45) while showing stronger results on lines (84), pigmentation (89), sagging (92), and puffiness (100).

48.0%35 subjects
Mean age29.4Range22–47Top skin typeOily (94%)Top skintonevery light (26%)
BreakoutsDark circlesHydrationLinesPigmentationPoresPuffinessRednessSaggingUniformness0255075100

Segment 2 — Older oily skin with low hydration

This segment is mostly oily and middle-aged, with very strong breakout scores but extremely low hydration and elevated redness, puffiness, dark circles, and pigmentation concerns.

52.0%38 subjects
Mean age51.7Range31–72Top skin typeOily (76%)Top skintonedark (26%)
BreakoutsDark circlesHydrationLinesPigmentationPoresPuffinessRednessSaggingUniformness0255075100

Demographics

Age groups

Subjects per coarse age bucket.

20%20%20%19%22%
18-2420%
25-3420%
35-4420%
45-5418.5%
55+21.5%

Predicted age distribution

Subjects per 5-year band (perceived age).

18-2228-3238-4248-5258-6268-7278+01020304010402020192614139161210

Predicted eye-area age

Subjects per 5-year band (eye-area age).

18-2228-3238-4248-5258-6268-7278+010203040173922141621161412181100

Skintone classification

Skin-tone distribution across the cohort, light to dark.

24%18%15%
very light24%
light11.5%
intermediate18%
tan14.5%
brown11%
dark12%
deep dark9%

Skin type classification

Subjects per skin type.

CombinationalDryNormalOily0%25.0%50.0%75.0%100.0%5.5%11.0%0.5%83.0%

Parameters

Tags are derived from algorithm scores (higher is better): ≥90 Great · 80–89 Good · 50–79 Average · <50 Poor.

Under Eye Puffiness

Mean score: 86.0 · Median score 100

PoorAverageGoodGreat03060901204.5%28.5%11.5%55.5%

Breakouts

Mean score: 79.7 · Median score 94

PoorAverageGoodGreat025507510015.1%6.3%7.1%71.4%

Dark Circles

Mean score: 75.0 · Median score 74

PoorAverageGoodGreat040801201600.0%76.5%15.0%8.5%

Lines

Mean score: 70.6 · Median score 75

PoorAverageGoodGreat01530456015.1%38.9%32.5%13.5%

Pigmentation

Mean score: 80.8 · Median score 90

PoorAverageGoodGreat0204060809.9%23.4%15.6%51.1%

Pores

Mean score: 72.4 · Median score 73

PoorAverageGoodGreat035701051404.5%64.5%25.0%6.0%

Redness

Mean score: 75.2 · Median score 78

PoorAverageGoodGreat02550751004.8%57.2%32.4%5.5%

Sagging

Mean score: 74.0 · Median score 83

PoorAverageGoodGreat01530456018.3%22.2%21.4%38.1%

Uniformness

Mean score: 35.2 · Median score 37

PoorAverageGoodGreat0408012016079.9%19.6%0.0%

Hydration

Mean score: 21.9 · Median score 12

PoorAverageGoodGreat0459013518086.4%12.1%1.5%0.0%

Image quality — overall scores

Front view score

Distribution (0–100, bins of 10).

10-2030-4050-6070-8090-100030609012054%19%2%25%

Left view score

Distribution (0–100, bins of 10).

10-2030-4050-6070-8090-100045901351802%12%86%

Right view score

Distribution (0–100, bins of 10).

10-2030-4050-6070-8090-100045901351802%8%90%